LL-37 · research summary
Bioinformation · 2026. Summary drawn from the study's full text. Each statement is followed by the exact sentence it comes from. This is a research summary, not medical advice.
Prospective cross-sectional study
“A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted involving 80 participants divided equally into four groups: OSCC, tobacco-associated OPMDs, non-tobacco-associated OPMDs and healthy controls (n = 20 each).”
Participants with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), tobacco-associated oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs), non-tobacco-associated OPMDs, and healthy controls
“Participants were divided into four groups: OSCC, tobacco- associated OPMDs, non-tobacco-associated OPMDs, and healthy controls.”
80 participants (20 per group)
“A total of 80 participants were included and divided equally into four groups: oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), tobacco-associated oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs), non-tobacco-associated OPMDs, and healthy controls.”
Salivary cathelicidin LL-37 levels increased progressively from healthy controls to OSCC cases.
“Mean salivary LL-37 levels demonstrated a progressive increase from healthy controls to patients with OSCC.”
Salivary LL-37 showed 100% sensitivity and 90% specificity for distinguishing pathological lesions from healthy individuals.
“Salivary cathelicidin LL-37 levels increased progressively from healthy controls to OSCC cases (p < 0.001) with 100% sensitivity and 90% specificity.”
Statistically significant differences in LL-37 levels were observed between all pairwise group comparisons.
“Post-hoc Tukey analysis (Table 3) demonstrated statistically significant differences between all pairwise group comparisons (p < 0.001).”
The study is cross-sectional and requires large-scale longitudinal studies for validation.
“Large-scale longitudinal studies are warranted to validate these findings and establish standardized clinical protocols.”
Source: PubMed 42701697 · DOI 10.6026/973206300223421 · all study summaries